Get FREE Access!
But studies in people can sometimes be hard to interpret, because there may be other factors affecting the results that are hard to account for. The blood brain barrier BBB , which normally protects the brain from excess glutamate and aspartate as well as toxins, 1 is not fully developed during childhood, 2 does not fully protect all areas of the brain, 3 is damaged by numerous chronic and acute conditions, and 4 allows seepage of excess glutamate and aspartate into the brain even when intact. Better Alternative Sweeteners Are all sweeteners bad? Hayes further justified his approval by citing the results of a Japanese brain tumor study,  the results of which, the PBOI chairman later said, would have resulted in an "unqualified approval" from the PBOI panel. Drinking diet beverages has been linked to depression more than once, including in one study of almost , participants over 10 years. Drinking or eating aspartame products is especially dangerous for mothers and young children because of the way it affects behaviors and conditions later in life. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr.
Decades of History
One animal study showed that artificial sweeteners saccharin, sucralose and aspartame appeared to spike blood sugar more than regular sugar. A guide to sweetener choices," 8 May Animal studies have linked aspartame to higher risk of several types of cancer, including lymphoma and leukemia.
The sweetener was discovered in the s and is often paired with aspartame , especially in diet sodas. Learn More about aspartame Britannica. Seen and Heard What made you want to look up aspartame? Need even more definitions? Get Word of the Day daily email! Ionian mode rococo balladry a cappella. Ask the Editors Ghost Word The story of an imaginary word that managed to sneak past our editors and enter the dictionary.
Behind the Scenes How we chose 'feminism' Literally How to use a word that literally drives some people nuts. The research and history of aspartame dangers is conclusive as a cause of illness and toxic reactions in the human body. Aspartame dangers are the result of its chemical structure, and its use during pregnancy and by children is one of the greatest aspartame dangers of all.
Aspartame dangers are the common denominator for over 92 different health symptoms at the root of modern disease. The Aspartame Detoxification Program demonstrates the most effective way to reverse aspartame dangers by removing the underlying cause - aspartame. I counsel aspartame victims worldwide and witness nine out of ten clients restore their health by following the Aspartame Detoxification Program. The chemical structure of aspartame causes the body to mimic these disease symptoms, but bottom line, it's aspartame disease.
The structure of aspartame seems simple, but what a complicated structure aspartame really is. Two isolated amino acids in aspartame are fused together by its third component, deadly methanol. In this structure, methanol bonds the two amino acids together, but when released at a mere 86 degrees Fahrenheit, the methanol becomes a poisonous free radical.
Methanol breaks down into formic acid and formaldehyde, embalming fluid. Methanol is a dangerous neurotoxin, a known carcinogen, causes retinal damage in the eye, interferes with DNA replication, and causes birth defects.
Aspartic acid makes up forty percent of the structure of aspartame. Under excess conditions, the structure of aspartic acid can cause endocrine hormone disorders and vision problems. Aspartic acid is a neuroexicter, which means its structure affects the central nervous system. Adverse reactions to aspartic acid are: The second isolated amino acid in aspartame's chemical structure is phenylalanine, fifty percent of aspartame's 3-D structure.
Too much phenylalanine causes seizures, elevated blood plasma, is dangerous for pregnancy causing retardation, PMS caused by phenylalanine's blockage of serotonin, insomnia, and severe mood swings.
Read more about Aspartame Side Effects. Hull also sells an aspartame detox kit, which might lead a cynical person to conclude that she cares more about selling alternative health products and stoking her sales with some unreasonable fear than about scientific evidence. What evidence does she have for such a conspiracy? Products get pulled from the market all the time when new evidence suggests they are not safe.
Also, the final safety net for the consumer is legal liability. Class action law suits have bankrupted companies, even when the underlying claims were false.
Imagine if they were true. Look how much the tobacco industry has had to fork over. But I am saying that a decades long conspiracy among industry, federal regulatory agencies, the medical community, and multiple research institutions and individual researchers — all under the nose of the press and lawyers looking for big class-action suits — is implausible in the extreme.
I am also arguing that we should fairly assess all the evidence, not just cherry pick the evidence we like and dismiss the rest out of hand. What does the evidence say about aspartame? A recent published review of all available evidence, including hundreds of studies, concluded:. The studies provide no evidence to support an association between aspartame and cancer in any tissue.
The weight of existing evidence is that aspartame is safe at current levels of consumption as a nonnutritive sweetener. Multiple reviews, going back to , conclude the same thing. Since this latest review there have been more studies, in various countries how big is this conspiracy? Like all such research, there is noise in the data but no apparent signal. There is no pattern of evidence to suggest that aspartame causes cancer, autoimmune disease, neurological disease, diabetes, or anything else its critics claim.
What legitimate scientific controversy there is comes from the animal data, mostly in rats. Here the evidence for a carcinogenic or genotoxic causing changes in the DNA effect of aspartame is mixed and requires careful review. Some effects, such as a dose-dependent effect on renal tumors, are specific to rats and do not translate to humans.
Other studies are plagued by significant flaws, such as properly calculating doses a big issue when trying to extrapolate doses from rats to humans. And still others show flat effects without a dose response curve, suggesting that a confounding factor, and not aspartame, is responsible for any observed increase in tumors. They found multiple significant flaws, as described above, and concluded:.